“北京華聯(lián)超市某店二樓的特賣(mài)區(qū)域有好多耐克、阿迪達(dá)斯、特步等品牌的運(yùn)動(dòng)鞋在賣(mài)，但都不是正品，均是仿的。”讀者王先生昨天去購(gòu)物時(shí)的發(fā)現(xiàn)讓他納悶，“這種國(guó)內(nèi)知名的大超市也公開(kāi)賣(mài)仿冒貨，不是誤導(dǎo)消費(fèi)者嗎?”

Mr. Wang said that when he went shopping at Hualian Supermarket yesterday, he found that on the second floor shelves there were sneakers marked with famous trademarks such as Nike, Adidas and so on. The price was very cheap, which was between 30~40 multivariate.

Mr. Wang said that when he first saw it, he thought he had such a good thing. But after careful observation, he found that the shoes were very poor in workmanship and material. Mr. Wang wondered, "a famous supermarket like this has sold the imitation products openly, and has produced notices for activities. It can mislead consumers and be irresponsible."

Yesterday afternoon, reporters rushed to the supermarket and saw a special sale area on the two floor. As described by Mr. Wang, many of the shoes on the shelves were printed with LOGO, such as Nike, Adidas, XTEP and so on.

When the reporter asked questions to the Supermarket Purchasing Guide, the guide member admitted that it was not a genuine product, but a brand LOGO.

Subsequently, the reporter went to the XTEP store on the first floor and proposed to the brand's shopping guide that the Hualian had imitation XTEP shoes. Its guide said, "this is normal."

Reporters later contacted Nike's agent in Hefei, the other side said that there are many things in the market, many large stores have.

Beijing Hualian yuan one store customer service said, this kind of selling imitation goods phenomenon many stores have, they did not indicate that they sell the brand, but the product used the brand design.

The industry and Commerce Department said that if these shoes were indeed used by other brands, they might be suspected of trademark infringement. The public could make a report by calling 12315, and the industry and Commerce Department will collect evidence at the scene and deal with it according to the actual situation.

148 Liu Fengshou, a lawyer on duty, said that if the product did use other brand names and misled consumers, it would be suspected of trademark infringement. Then the company holding the trademark could ask the supermarket to stop infringement and compensate for the corresponding losses. If consumers had a significant impact on consumers, they could also make compensation.