This is the first time that China's textile and garment enterprises have the top 500 competitiveness in 10 years.

Wang Tiankai, vice president of the China Textile Industry Federation and Xia Lingmin, attended the meeting and delivered an important speech. Ma Jian, deputy mayor of Zhengzhou, gave a welcome speech on behalf of the Zhengzhou Municipal People's government.

Xia Lingmin, vice president of the China Textile Industry Federation, released China in 2011 and 2012

Garment enterprise competitiveness analysis report.

Since 2003, the China Federation of textile industry has been carrying out the research on the competitiveness of textile and garment enterprises. Based on the theory of enterprise competitiveness evaluation and the characteristics of textile industry, the evaluation system of competitiveness of Chinese textile enterprises has been developed and perfected in the course of evaluation and practice.

According to this evaluation system, we collect data on enterprise competitiveness every year, conduct quantitative evaluation of enterprise competitiveness, publish evaluation results and Competitiveness Research Report.

So far, China Textile and garment enterprises competitiveness evaluation and release activities have been carried out for 10 years.

The continuous development of this work not only enables the industry to grasp the competitiveness of enterprises in the industry in a timely manner, but also effectively cultivates and promotes the dominant enterprises and high-quality brands in the textile industry, which greatly promotes the continuous upgrading of these competitive advantages of enterprises and thus drives the development of the entire industry.

More confidence in difficult situations

In recent years, China's textile industry is facing increasingly serious internal and external challenges: the world economy has not yet come out of the shadow of the international financial crisis, the European sovereign debt crisis is continuing to spread, and the demand for the international market is insufficient.

Domestic economic downward pressure has increased, domestic demand market growth has begun to slow down, coupled with obvious fluctuations in textile raw material prices, domestic and foreign cotton price inversion problem has highlighted, factor cost of labor and energy continues to rise, textile economic growth rate has continued to fall, business efficiency has slipped, loss making enterprises have increased, business pressure has increased, investment growth has dropped significantly, many entrepreneurs lack confidence, and feel confused about future development.

At this critical moment, it is more important to insist on evaluating and publishing competitiveness of industrial enterprises.

Through the evaluation of the competitiveness of the whole industry and backbone enterprises, we can fully understand the real situation of the competitiveness of the industry and enterprises, not only see their own advantages and opportunities for development, enhance their confidence in the whole industry, but also find out the main factors and universality problems that affect the competitiveness of enterprises at present, find ways to continue to maintain the competitiveness of enterprises, explore ways to enhance their competitiveness, and put forward pertinent measures and suggestions.

Four characteristics to see changes

The evaluation activities of the top 500 industries continue to receive the attention of the majority of enterprises. The garment industry and chemical fiber industry also expanded from the top 10 evaluation in the past year to the 20 industry evaluation.

According to the 2011~2012 China Textile

A preliminary analysis of the evaluation results of the top 500 competitiveness of enterprises shows that, despite the complicated situation of the international financial crisis, although the top 500 companies have been affected by some of the key enterprises, the enterprises have taken measures to deal with them positively, and resolutely promote the continuous improvement of competitiveness, and do not relax their social responsibilities at all times.

In general, the following characteristics are presented:

First, the competitiveness of enterprises with competitive advantages is outstanding.

The average industrial gross output and the average household profit of the 500 finalists in 2011 were several times higher than the average industrial gross output value and the average household profit of Enterprises above the scale of the industry.

Second, the capability of innovation of backbone enterprises in the central and western regions is outstanding.

From the regional structural data of the 500 competitive enterprises of the whole industry, the average R & D investment of the enterprises in the central and western regions is significantly higher than that of the top 500 of the whole industry. The average R & D investment accounts for the proportion of the main business income.

Moreover, the level of innovation input is relatively high, and the innovation performance of the Western finalists is obviously higher than that of the 500 competitive industries.

Third, the enterprises with the top 10 competitiveness (20 strong) in this industry are striving to raise their production level by increasing R & D efforts and improving their innovation level. They have played an important leading role in profitability, innovation and management capabilities.

From the point of view of industries, the average profit rate of the top 10 enterprises in the industrial sector is the highest; the average profit margin of the top 10 enterprises in the knitting industry is the second; the average profit margin of the top 10 enterprises in the garment industry and the 10 enterprises in the wool textile industry is also higher.

Fourth, the competitive advantages of various industries and the results of energy conservation and consumption reduction have been further consolidated.

Although faced with the complex external environment test, the comprehensive pressure has increased, but the current evaluation data show that the top 500 competitive enterprises, the 10 most competitive enterprises (20 strong), the enterprises still adhere to the work of energy conservation and consumption reduction, the unit output value of electricity consumption and water consumption have a significant decline.

Of course, due to the financial crisis and other unfavorable factors, competitive advantage enterprises also encountered some difficulties and development resistance.

According to the comparison of the evaluation data, the average profit margin of the 500 competitive enterprises in this industry is higher than the average profit margin of all enterprises above 2011, but it is slightly lower than the average profit margin of the top 500 enterprises.

At the same time, the R & D investment and total assets contribution index of the 500 top companies in 2011 declined slightly compared with the previous year.

"Dream ten team" shoulders heavy responsibilities

On the whole, the comprehensive quality of the top 500 enterprises and 10 strong (20 strong) enterprises in various industries has been further improved.

Advantages and exemplary leading role continue to be strengthened, especially in terms of innovation and rapid reaction capability, profitability, development capability, asset quality, manpower quality and scale level.