"P >" professional buy dummy Yan "spent 6192 yuan, bought two pairs of imported men's < a href=" //m.pmae.cn/news/index_c.asp "> leather shoes < /a > in an international shopping plaza in Shanghai. After that, Yama identified the origin of the Chinese shoes with the Chinese shoes, which was inconsistent with the actual situation. Recently, the people's Court of Jingan District, Shanghai, decided to support Yan's appeal by the first instance. The merchants returned the pair of BIKKEMBERGS men's shoes, which were returned by Yan. At the same time, they returned Yan's 6192 yuan to compensate Yan for 6192 yuan. < /p >
In P, November 2, 2013, Yan bought two pairs of brand men's shoes in the < a href= "http://m.pmae.cn/news/index_c.asp" > shopping plaza < /a >, the price of each pair of shoes was 3096 yuan (the original price was 3696 yuan), which amounted to 6192 yuan. After the discovery of the purchased shoe tongue, the place of origin is Italy, while the sole label is Slovakia. Yam believed that the sales behavior of the shopping plaza constituted fraud, so it sued the court earlier this year to order the merchant to pay back one. < /p >
< p > court, the businessman thought that in the process of selling men's leather shoes, did not take any false or improper means to deliberately deceive yam. It is claimed that in the eyes of businessmen, the two pairs of imported high-grade leather shoes bought by Yan bought in the shopping mall are businessmen who mark the origin of the commodity logo, and mistakenly label the shoes made in Italy as the place of origin for Slovakia. Objectively, the legitimate rights and interests of Yan are not damaged, but on the contrary, they also benefit from it. < /p >
< p > emphasize that the "a href=" //m.pmae.cn/news/index_c.asp "professional buy dummy" /a > Yan's lawsuit is a malicious lawsuit. Merchants only agree to refund Yan's purchase of two pairs of leather shoes, and do not agree to claim twice the amount of the money. < /p >
< p > the court held that, because the businessman failed to disclose the true information of Yan's purchase of men's shoes, the act of buying and selling violated the consumers' legitimate right to know, and could not be labeled as "low grade area" by the "high-grade area" as the "origin of men's leather shoes". < /p >
< p > related links: < /p >
< p > according to the Putian textile inspection and Quarantine Bureau staff, why is there such a high frequency of six valent chromium exceeding the standard notification, mainly due to the new version of the safety footwear regulations that came into effect in June 2012. The new regulations stipulate that the six valence chromium content should not exceed 3ppm. More noteworthy is that in March 26th, the European Commission amended the REACH regulations to limit six valent chromium in leather products and will take effect in May 1, 2015. < /p >
< p > it is understood that there are two reasons for the formation of six valent chromium in leather: one case is that six leather chromium is contained in leather material. In another case, during the tanning process, trivalent chromium in chrome tanned leather was oxidized to six valent chromium. It is worth noting that heating and illumination can increase the content of six valent chromium in leather. < /p >
< p > EU is one of the main markets of footwear exports in Putian, accounting for 15% of the total value of footwear exports in Putian. To ensure that footwear products conform to the new EU safety shoes standards, Putian inspection and Quarantine Bureau suggests that the footwear association should strengthen risk information warning in a timely manner, and remind enterprises to strengthen the detection of six valent chromium content of leather raw materials. At the same time, enterprises should strictly monitor the environmental factors of raw materials and finished products storage and transportation, so as to prevent trivalent chromium from being oxidized to six valence chromium. < /p >