< p > June 23rd, < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > Shanghai < /a > Consumer Protection Committee issued the fifth phase "comparative test" this year, announced the results of this year's comparative test on board shoes, the results showed that many brands of shoes were not qualified.

< /p >

< p > comparative test found that the women's casual shoes, which were produced by Howard sum (China) Limited, and the men's middle class bamboo band rubber vulcanized shoes produced by Shanghai keg Clothing Co., Ltd. were not fit for the durability index, and the casual shoes produced by Shanghai hunting Shoes Co., Ltd. were not qualified in the "rubbing color fastness" index of shoe and inner bottom.

< /p >

< p > it is understood that < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > board shoes < /a > originally designed for skateboard sports professional sports shoes, after design and improvement, become popular young casual welcome with the necessary single products.

< /p >

< p > recently, the municipal consumer protection commission bought 75 samples of board shoes, and tested the tensile strength, elongation at break, wear resistance, wear resistance, hardness and pH value. Among them, 6 samples did not meet the relevant product standards, and the rate of non conformity was 8%. The problems were mainly concentrated on five indexes, such as flexural resistance, tensile strength, pH value, free formaldehyde, shoe lining and inner bottom friction color fastness.

< /p >