A comparative test of silk garments made by the Beijing consumers' Association recently showed that 40 samples of the 100 test samples did not meet the standard requirements. Among the 12 samples, there were problems in the use instructions. The quality indicators of 28 samples did not meet the relevant standard requirements. 5 samples of the 30 samples purchased by the entity store had problems, accounting for 16.7% of the samples in the physical store. Among the 70 samples purchased by the online shopping platform, 35 samples had problems, accounting for 50% of the number of online shopping samples. There are 9 samples that are not contained in mulberry silk, and are not in line with the publicity or product description.

Fiber content is an important reference index for consumers to choose silk clothing, and is also the only basis for judging whether the product is silk clothing. According to the test, the measured values of the fiber content of 9 samples in the 100 samples do not conform to the specifications of the tag. 6 of the online shopping samples are claimed to be silk clothing, but the tag shows and does not contain silk, and involves vip.com, jumei.com and other platforms. Although some products are marked with real fiber content in the product details page, consumers will be misled if they do not distinguish carefully, and are suspected of misleading consumers.

Tear strength is an important indicator of the durability of silk clothing. If the strength of silk clothing is too low, it is easy for consumers to break and tear the fabric in the process of use, which will affect the wearing performance of the garment. After testing, the tear strength of the 4 samples is not up to standard.