Beijing Consumers Association and other 21 cities' consumer associations (Consumer Council and Consumer Protection Committee) jointly released the sports wear comparative test results on the 6 day: the two brands of Northland and CONVERSE

Beijing Consumers Association said that the comparative test was launched jointly by the 21 member units of the 2011 urban rights forum, and is implemented by the Shenzhen municipal Consumer Council, the rotating chairman of the forum.

The 60 comparison test samples involved 21 brands, all purchased by the Shenzhen Municipal Council staff from the market, basically covering the common brands and well-known brands on the market.

The staff of the CC commissioned the Shenzhen Metrology quality inspection and Research Institute to test the decomposed carcinogenic aromatic amine dyes, formaldehyde content, pH value and color fastness according to the national mandatory standards and relevant product implementation standards.

The results showed that the quality of the 60 samples was good, and no formaldehyde and decomposable aromatic amine dyes were found to be harmful to consumers' health.

Among them, there are 56.

It is reported that the Nanjing's Border City Sporting Goods Co., Ltd., the production of the three Virginia women's wear clothing (trade mark: Northland, model / number GS112518), and the nominal Shanghai Dow Fen Knitting Co., Ltd. production of Hooded zipper sweater (trade mark: CONVERSE, model / number C311M228408), these two products have more than the "national textile product basic safety technical specification" to pH value standards.

It is reported that pH value is the safety index of textiles, if pH exceeds standard.

In addition, the trousers (trademark: Colunbia, model / number PM8843) produced by the nominal Jian Bang garments (Huizhou) Co., Ltd. and the Foshan road Knitting Company Limited, produced by the name of the company, are a series of logos club / head garment (trademark: LOTTO, model / number EWDF095-3 qualifying product) produced by the Qinshun Knitting Company Ltd., and the two products do not meet the standard of color fastness.

The comparison test publisher indicated that the results of this comparative test were only responsible for the test samples, and did not represent the quality of other brands and batches of the brand.