< p style= "text-align: center" > < img border= "0" align= "center" width= "367" height= "239" alt= "" height= "/" > "

Zhang Xiangchen, Assistant Minister of Commerce, said that the industrial policy of China's foreign trade should be positioned in the intermediate products and process trade with comparative advantages, rather than the whole industry chain, at the < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > the twelfth China Enterprise Development Summit Forum < /a > recently.

This is determined by the global industrial value chain.

Chinese enterprises should seek breakthroughs in the "two innovations".

< /p >

< p > < < a href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > > made in China > /a > advancing from fame to pformation and upgrading of the "China creation". Entrepreneurs who started from the generation processing industry have been committed to extending the "smile curve" to the hard exploration of brand, R & D and sales, all of which show that Chinese enterprises are trying to find the ultimate goal of the high-end industry, trying to find the full coverage of the industrial chain to show the true qualities of "made in China".

But what is the position of "made in China" in the global industrial value chain? Not many Chinese entrepreneurs can speak clearly. Therefore, we can not find north in the process of closely following the global value chain and keeping pace with the world's first tier of technology. It is more important and urgent to make clear that the value orientation of "made in China" in the global industrial value chain is more important than ever.

The assumption that "made in China" is located in intermediate products and process trade shows us that the real efficiency of "made in China" is the two innovation.

< /p >

P > China's industry is entering the historical period of "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "pformation" /a > upgrading. Chinese enterprises are experiencing new industries and product innovations. The reality is that Chinese enterprises' original innovation capability is relatively weak, and the accumulation of technological talents and technological innovation can not be compared with developed countries.

However, this does not mean that Chinese enterprises' innovation ability is very low.

In recent years, Chinese enterprises have made great strides in "going global" to find partners in the world's developed economies. In this process, win-win cooperation is one aspect, and on the other hand, we learn from the advanced manufacturing industry's management and technology in developed countries through cooperation.

Chinese enterprises find their place in the global value chain.

This process of learning and borrowing enables Chinese enterprises to acquire and possess the capability of "two innovations".

Although this "two innovation" is an innovation that stands on the shoulders of giants, this innovation itself is more economical and convenient than original innovation. Chinese enterprises, which are not very strong in technological strength and capability, are undoubtedly more in line with the reality of Chinese enterprises at this stage, and also ensure that Chinese industries are less or no detours in pformation and upgrading.

< /p >

< p > < a href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > China's industrial policy < /a > positioning in intermediate products and process trade, because intermediate products occupy 60% of the global trade share.

Trade in services accounts for 20% of Global trade, but 30% of trade in goods that account for 80% of Global trade is driven by trade in services.

Therefore, the actual service trade accounts for half of the global trade.

We have to face up to the fact that there is a misunderstanding in the innovation strategy of Chinese enterprises, which is to look at the original innovation and neglect the two innovation.

Only the original innovation is the real innovation. The two innovation has a certain degree of "reference". When it comes to the market, it will encounter other people's criticism.

However, we should not evade. When the Japanese economy took off quickly, it focused on the role of the two innovation in industrial pformation and upgrading, and formed the industrial structure and scale of Japan today.

This precedent is of reference to Chinese enterprises.

< /p >

< p > global industrial value chain is an open field, but Chinese enterprises have limited opportunities to gain their own development. This forces Chinese enterprises to acquire technological and upgrading support from the global value chain.

To achieve this, I am afraid walking on two legs is the best policy. On the one hand, Chinese enterprises should speed up the pace of "going out" and grasp and learn the technology of these enterprises in the M & A of developed countries.

On the other hand, Chinese enterprises must not neglect the training of basic innovation capability in the two innovation process.

The two innovation needs to be supported by basic innovation.

In the pformation and upgrading of textile industry, Jiangsu Sunshine Group has built a high efficiency road of "people without me" through the strong basic innovation ability. Under the condition of the global textile industry's great depression, relying on the advantages of < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/ index_c.asp" > innovation ability < /a >, the sunshine group has been walking on the forefront of new product development in the world.

< /p >