In terms of leadership style and leadership style, there is no difference between good and bad, as long as it is good for completing tasks and achieving maximum efficiency and effectiveness. As an enterprise leader, if you can understand the advantages and disadvantages of these different leadership styles and leadership styles, it will help to form your own unique leadership style and leadership style, thereby affecting the potential of your employees and affecting the performance of the whole enterprise. From the practice of many leaders at home and abroad, successful leaders should use various leadership methods to guide employees, educate employees and motivate employees according to the actual situation, according to local conditions, and freely change them in various ways so as to fully distribute outstanding leadership.

　　 1, and enterprise Matching development

An excellent leader The leadership styles and methods should be adjusted at any time according to the different stages, sizes and objects of the company's development. As Konosuke Matsushita said, "when my employees have l00 names, I have to stand at the front of the staff and command their subordinates. When the staff increase to 1000 people, I must stand in the middle of the staff, plead with the staff to help each other. When employees reach 10000, I just stand behind the staff and feel grateful."

Different stages of development and scale should adopt different ways of leadership. For example, small businesses and start-ups, because of the small number of employees, can take the lead of their leaders, establish their authority and example power by action, and guide their employees to imitate the effect, that is, adopting the leadership style of "leading by example". They can also combine the leadership style of "patient persuasion", pay attention to family management, listen to each member's complaints and persuade them. With the continuous development of the company and the gradual expansion of the workforce, the "patient persuasion" style of leadership may no longer be practical. At this point, we should gradually shift to institutionalization and adopt other more effective leadership methods.

Different industries or industries should adopt different ways of leadership. Otherwise, the leadership of enterprises will be greatly reduced, and even the enterprises will be led to the brink of death. For example, high-tech enterprises face a changeable, fast and competitive environment. At this time, we need to inspire more team spirit and encourage innovation. If the enterprise adopts the "mandatory" leadership method, it may inhibit innovation; while the traditional enterprises are facing relatively stable and slow development market, and the profit space is small. This requires thorough, comprehensive and strict management to reduce consumption and reduce costs. At this point, "mandatory" leadership can become an ideal choice.

　　 2, and cultural background Adaptation

Every country or region has its unique cultural background, for example, western culture is very direct, while eastern culture is more implicit. Even the Oriental cultures of China and Japan differ greatly in their way of thinking and values. Therefore, for cross-cultural management leaders, different leadership styles should be adopted for different cultural backgrounds or teams. Otherwise, it will affect the exertion of leadership and seriously lead to cultural conflicts.

For example, brainstorming is often adopted by enterprises when making decisions. When brainstorming in countries such as Europe and the United States, participants write their views on a piece of paper, and explain their ideas and opinions in front of everyone. Then we collate ideas and viewpoints into a framework to discuss the whole framework, and the results are very good. But in Japan, brainstorming in this way is totally out of the question. You can let them write their own ideas in private, but it is very difficult for them to explain their own ideas in public, not to mention objective comments on others' opinions, so it is impossible to achieve the desired results. Under such circumstances, we must change the way of leadership. For example, we should concentrate on the ideas or opinions we have put forward, so that we do not know who will put forward any suggestions and we will have less discussion.