< p > in spite of the survey results released by Gallup in 2009, the engagement of < a href= "http://m.pmae.cn/" > Chinese employees < /a > increased by 4 percentage points. But the fact that the "bottom of the world" situation is only 1/5 of the US is still worrying. Most of the netizens chose the recognition of the data's scientificity and authenticity. The relevant experts gave a positive response to the "very likely" and "more real expression of the mentality of the Chinese employed". Faced with the embarrassment of the "Chinese employees who are least dedicated," what people need is not to rush away from the relationship or to justify "diligence", but to be bold in facing, reflecting deeply, and correcting in practice. < /p >
< p > the Chinese nation's "industrious and hard work" is obvious to all and recognized worldwide. But why is it hard to win the reputation of "a href=" //m.pmae.cn/ "/a"? In fact, the so-called "engagement" reflects the degree of intelligence, emotion and commitment that employees invest in the company. The perspective is the loyalty, sense of belonging and responsibility of the laborer from the bottom of the heart. Her external performance includes many levels such as being willing to publicize, willing to stay, and giving full effort. That is to say, only by focusing on "career" and being loyal to the "career", will the "conscientious" based on cognition and consciousness arise spontaneously. < /p >
< p > in real life, "dedication" is often compared with "love", because "love" is the most fundamental driving force for practice. Only by doing one line and loving each other, can you do well in one line and achieve an ideal and become a a href= "http://m.pmae.cn/", a professional and /a elite. Lei Feng and Jiao Yulu are good examples of loving their profession and dedication. Nowadays, when people regard "employment" as "making a living", "working in a bowl" and "making money", how do they talk about their "professional love" and "admiration" from their inner heart? The college students are eager to apply for civil service, which is a guaranteed and risk-free "iron rice bowl". < /p >
< p > of course, the reason why China's employee engagement is at the bottom of the world is not only due to the utilitarian thinking of money supremacy, but also the reality of management system and living environment. The current situation of employment and the pressure of living beyond their means make people only appreciate the hard work of "supporting their families" and have a passion for belonging and pleasure. They are accustomed to "command and control" of enterprise management, inhibit or even destroy the initiative and flexibility of their employees, and are hard to arouse their professional identity. No loyalty, no loyalty, no devotion. < /p >
< p > < a href= > //m.pmae.cn/ > labor force < /a > is the most active and dynamic factor in productivity. Employee engagement is closely related to enterprise development, social progress and national happiness. Without devotion to work, there is no real enterprise or industry quality. It is more talked about upgrading "made in China" to "created in China". The bottom line of the global ranking of engagement reminds us that it is imperative to enhance the professionalism of our citizens. It is expected that through the government's reform, enterprise restructuring and national internal training, China's employee engagement will be enhanced simultaneously with the "great power status". < /p >