When you are employed in an entry job, your manager is likely to be a manager at a lower level.

He or she may be very competent in managing personnel, and there are still a large number of people on the head who can veto every decision, especially those involving spending decisions.

Why? Money supply is not infinite.

The operation of many companies' raise funds is as follows.

1. the high level leadership team decides the overall budget for the raise.

This is usually referred to as the percentage of current wages.

So they say it can increase by 3%.

2. each manager for his staff

The wage budget is 3%.

If you give a person 5%, you are forced to give another person less than 3%.

In short, it must go to 3%.

Three

It can overturn decisions.

A low-level manager may say that his new employee is worth 5% of the salary increase, but the senior manager may decide that the money is best spent on one of her direct subordinates.

So she needs to pick out 2% from 10 different new employees, in order to get higher pay according to her choice.

4. there are some small ones.

In the whole year, it is arranged for salary increase, whether it is promotion or helping someone to achieve market level.

Similarly, the money is controlled by the high level.

In this case, the fact that someone else gets a raise does not mean that your boss is lying, or he doesn't want you to get a decent salary increase.

It only means that those in power have decided that since the supply of funds is limited, others should get a raise.

It is better to ask for an update than to "oppose" the boss.

You can even say, "I know that the finance committee meeting decided on some pay raises because John got a raise.

Can you tell me where I am? "You should also remember that 3% pay rise is probably considered a higher than average salary increase, especially for a new employee.